Comments on: Reading the NYTimes http://herhistory.org/2008/11/09/reading-the-nytimes/ Tue, 22 May 2012 09:39:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Phaea http://herhistory.org/2008/11/09/reading-the-nytimes/#comment-21391 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:49:10 +0000 http://herhistory.org/2008/11/09/reading-the-nytimes/#comment-21391 Ryan, I wish that I was as eloquent at Ms. Rose, but I think that people who tell other people to 'rethink' opinions are absolutely moronic. But if you want to stand by your opinion, please 'rethink' using your right to vote. We have enough crazies out there with out you. Thanks! Ryan, I wish that I was as eloquent at Ms. Rose, but I think that people who tell other people to ‘rethink’ opinions are absolutely moronic. But if you want to stand by your opinion, please ‘rethink’ using your right to vote. We have enough crazies out there with out you. Thanks!

]]> by: Ms. Rose http://herhistory.org/2008/11/09/reading-the-nytimes/#comment-21386 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:55:04 +0000 http://herhistory.org/2008/11/09/reading-the-nytimes/#comment-21386 I understand that a president cannot overturn a state const. amendment. I wrote this at a time when I was very upset at this news. However, I CAN wish for the state sanction of marriage for heterosexual or homosexual(or whatever term either group wants to use to define themselves) all I want. Additionally, I have no need to rethink my position on human sexuality. I think we have a different working definition of "normal" (though I have to say that term is vague). I understand that a president cannot overturn a state const. amendment. I wrote this at a time when I was very upset at this news. However, I CAN wish for the state sanction of marriage for heterosexual or homosexual(or whatever term either group wants to use to define themselves) all I want.

Additionally, I have no need to rethink my position on human sexuality. I think we have a different working definition of “normal” (though I have to say that term is vague).

]]> by: Ryan Haecker http://herhistory.org/2008/11/09/reading-the-nytimes/#comment-21376 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:50:42 +0000 http://herhistory.org/2008/11/09/reading-the-nytimes/#comment-21376 No. The president has no power to overturn state constituional amendments. Moreover, your support of homosexual relations is grossly mistaken, and you should not wish for either dictatorial abridgement of constitutional processes or the state sanction of homosexual relations. Please rethink your views on human sexuality- its normal functioning, purpose, and social functoin. No. The president has no power to overturn state constituional amendments. Moreover, your support of homosexual relations is grossly mistaken, and you should not wish for either dictatorial abridgement of constitutional processes or the state sanction of homosexual relations. Please rethink your views on human sexuality- its normal functioning, purpose, and social functoin.

]]>